Capt'n, my Message 4164 in Pirate Applications : cube 5.05 thread is displayed with broken formatting. When I try to reply to this message, even the preview is not possible. When I copy the original contents into the reply (or try to edit the problem message), the preview is broken the same way.

When posting, the preview and message were OK, I swear as a pirate!
____________
Peter .-)

PovAddict wrote:

I'm [...] waiting for "some more mature 5.7.x" ;-)

As far as I know, that throttling works horrible. In fact it worked badly on previous 5.7.x version. Ask Kathryn, she tested a broken-throttling client.

I know, I'm reading her notes here-and-there. Therefore I'm waiting for... :-)

So what's wrong with it? ;-)

Do tell though what browser you use.

I started a new instance of IE - the same. Then tried good ol' Netscape 7.2 - it's nearly OK, no overlapping (nearly!), but the vertically moved quote boxes can be seen too. Large gap between "Xxxx wrote:" and missing (at least little) gap between the box and a reply.
No, at some browser font sizes they overlap in Netscape too.

Capt'n, any comment?
____________
Peter .-)

Ageless wrote:

So what's wrong with it? ;-)

Do tell though what browser you use.

The new IE7, see the result.

Yesterday I adjusted the spacing below the quote boxes in the style sheet, so that it would look right (or at least readable) with or without a blank line after the [/quote]. It looked okay to me on Firefox.

Was it okay on IE7 before that?



____________
-- Eric Myers

"Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats

Yesterday I adjusted the spacing below the quote boxes in the style sheet, so that it would look right (or at least readable) with or without a blank line after the [/ quote]. It looked okay to me on Firefox.

As long as it's valid CSS, and designed to look like what the standards say it should look, it should be OK on all browsers. If it's not, it's browser's fault, not yours.

Wormholio wrote:

Yesterday I adjusted the spacing below the quote boxes in the style sheet, so that it would look right (or at least readable) with or without a blank line after the [/ quote]. It looked okay to me on Firefox.

As long as it's valid CSS, and designed to look like what the standards say it should look, it should be OK on all browsers. If it's not, it's browser's fault, not yours.

EDIT: oh my gawd, look at this mess. Happened both in preview and in actual post.

EDIT2: added a space to the [/ quote] Wormholio had typed and it kind of solved it...

Forum is broken! forum_forum.php gets an empty page. I guess there are also some PHP errors but they aren't shown because error reporting is off (my guess).

Well, thanks to the validator I found some errors in the CSS, including some stray text at the head of the file. Different browsers will react to errors in different ways, but now it should be valid CSS. How do quotes look now on IE7?

Forum is broken! forum_forum.php gets an empty page. I guess there are also some PHP errors but they aren't shown because error reporting is off (my guess).

PovAddict wrote:

Forum is broken!

Please, [size=+1]keep PANIC![/size]

Pepo wrote:

PovAddict wrote:

Forum is broken!

Please, [size=+1]keep PANIC![/size]

I will [size=+1]I will![/size]

*panics*

Forum is broken! forum_forum.php gets an empty page.

Capt'n, seems like you've got it! The whole forum (especially the main page) and messages looks somehow cleen and tidy to me (did I miss a tidy-up round?) and the nested comments are again rendered correctly on my IE7.
____________
Peter .-)

Capt'n, seems like you've got it! The whole forum (especially the main page) and messages looks somehow cleen and tidy to me (did I miss a tidy-up round?) and the nested comments are again rendered correctly on my IE7.

Comments? Um yes... use something else than hard yellow. :)
____________
Jord.

Used to be a single voice that vanished in a crowd. Vague just like a distant sun when hidden by the clouds.
Found a way to surface and to speak my truth aloud. Be powerful. Stand fast and proud

That's better, Eric. :)

The all new Pirates ice salon, now opened!
Raspberry blue -- $0.50
Banana yello -- $0.55
Pistachio green -- $0.75


____________
Jord.

Used to be a single voice that vanished in a crowd. Vague just like a distant sun when hidden by the clouds.
Found a way to surface and to speak my truth aloud. Be powerful. Stand fast and proud

colorblind me... blueberry blue. :)

Question list shows BBcode tags. It should either convert to HTML or remove them.

Question list shows BBcode tags. It should either convert to HTML or remove them.

Maybe (at least links) to convert them to plain text with attached link in parenthesis?
..... this-is-the-link-text (http://the.link.text/file.html) ....

This (the same) one:
"Capt'n, my [ url=http://pirates.spy-hill.net/forum_thread.php?id=670#4164 ]Message 4164[ /url ] in [ u ]Pirate Applications :..."
____________
Peter .-)

The easiest thing to do is to convert to HTML. There is already a function for that.

But the right thing to do is to convert to plain text. In this context, it's just the text which begins the posting. Plain text is fine, and the links or other formatting will be there when the thread is read.
____________
-- Eric Myers

"Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats

The easiest thing to do is to convert to HTML. [...] But the right thing to do is to convert to plain text.

Another way, probably not efficient, but easy, is converting to HTML and striping HTML tags afterwards

There is already a vestigial strip_tags() to remove HTML from the excerpt. Converting BB code to HTML just before that strips out both.

Wormholio wrote:

There is already a vestigial strip_tags() to remove HTML from the excerpt...

strip_tags is currently not used....

PovAddict wrote:

strip_tags is currently not used....

I think you misunderstand me. In the code I'm working on there was already a strip_tags(), probably left over from the days before BBcode.